To insert individual citation into a bibliography in a word-processor,
select your preferred citation style below and drag-and-drop it into the document.
In Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference (DEST), 2011 Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on (May 2011), pp. 317-323, doi:10.1109/dest.2011.5936615 Key: citeulike:11602792
Formatted Citation
Show HTML
Likes
(beta)
This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.
Philological research is very much concerned with the idea of data provenance. However, existing provenance models in eResearch and eScience for data and workflow are ill-applicable to the specific challenges of philological research in the digital age. In philology, provenance data must be collected not only for the complete research objects, but also for fragments - in particular for texts. This necessitates a much richer provenance model that is interwoven with the objects' textual structure and supports the association of provenance data with individual words. It must also permit multiple interpretations of provenance for a single research object. In this, the requirements in digital philology can also be paradigmatic for very fine-granular provenance information collection in other domain-specific digital ecosystems. This paper elaborates key requirements of data and workflow provenance in the philologies and demonstrates how the tools in the TextGrid digital humanities ecosystem answer to those needs. In addition to TextGrid's text-image-link editor and its underlying data model the paper also introduces the humanities' provenance tool HPT for RESTful workflows. HPT is specifically geared to supporting the provenance requirements for workflows in heterogeneous digital humanities ecosystems.
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic
(which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments.
It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions.
The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager
like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.