CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Dexamethasone-based therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results of the prospective Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG) protocol ALL-9 (1997-2004). Export

The lancet oncology (9 September 2009)

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


Amazoness's tags for this article

all dcog dexamethasone

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

BACKGROUND: A population-based cohort of children aged 1-18 years with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) was treated with a dexamethasone-based protocol (Dutch Childhood Oncology Group [DCOG] ALL-9). We aimed to confirm the results of the most effective DCOG ALL protocol for non-high-risk (NHR) patients to date (ALL-6), compare results with ALL-7 and ALL-8, and study prognostic factors in a non-randomised setting. METHODS: From Jan 1, 1997, until Nov 1, 2004, patients with ALL were treated according to the ALL-9 protocol in eight Dutch academic centres with their affiliated peripheral hospitals. Patients were stratified into NHR and high risk (HR) groups. HR criteria were white-blood-cell count of 50 000 cells per muL or more, T-cell phenotype, mediastinal mass, CNS or testicular involvement, and Philadelphia chromosome or MLL rearrangement; patients who did not fulfil these criteria were deemed to be NHR. The NHR group was treated with a three-drug induction (dexamethasone, vincristine, and asparaginase) for 6 weeks, medium-dose methotrexate for 3 weeks, then maintenance therapy. HR patients received a four-drug induction (as for the NHR patients plus daunorubicin) for 6 weeks, high-dose methotrexate for 8 weeks, and two intensification courses before receiving maintenance therapy. Triple intrathecal medication was given 13 times in NHR patients, 15 times in HR patients (17 times for patients with initial CNS involvement). No patient received cranial irradiation. Maintenance therapy was given until 109 weeks for all patients and consisted of mercaptopurine and methotrexate for 5 weeks, alternated with dexamethasone and vincristine for 2 weeks. Kaplan-Meier analysis was done on an intention-to-treat basis with event-free survival as the primary endpoint. This trial is registered at trialregister.nl, number NTR460/SNWLK-ALL-9. FINDINGS: 859 patients were recruited to the study. Complete remission was achieved in 592 (98.5%) of the 601 patients in the NHR group and 250 (96.9%) of the 258 in the HR group. Five patients in the NHR group and four in the HR group died during induction. Median follow-up for patients alive was 72.2 (range 4.8-132.7) months as of August, 2008. 5-year event-free survival was 81% (SE 1%) in all patients: 84% (2%) in NHR patients, and 72% (3%) in HR patients. Isolated CNS relapses occurred in 22 (2.6%) of 842 patients. In a multivariate analysis, DNA index was the strongest predictor of outcome (<1.16 vs >/=1.16; relative risk 0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.78), followed by age (1-9 vs >/=10 years; 2.23, 1.60-3.11) and white-blood-cell count (<50 000 vs >/=50 000 cells per muL; 1.60, 1.13-2.26). INTERPRETATION: The overall results of the dexamethasone-based DCOG ALL-9 protocol are better than those of our previous Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster-based protocols ALL-7 and ALL-8. The results for NHR patients were achieved with high cumulative doses of dexamethasone and vincristine, but without the use of anthracyclines, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, or cranial irradiation, therefore minimising the risk of side-effects. FUNDING: Dutch Health Insurers.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.