![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Azdak's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Commodification, normalisation and intervention: Cultural, social and symbolic capital in housing consumption and governanceby: J. Flint, R. Rowlands
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Vol. 18, No. 3. (September 2003), pp. 213-232.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThis paper relates the governance of anti-social behaviour in the UK to a wider policy conceptualisation of social housing as a flawed and problematic form of housing consumption. Drawing on the theoretical work of Bourdieu and Foucault, the paper identifies how the habitus of housing consumption is shaped by acts of governance including classification, legitimisation, normalisation and targeted intervention. The paper argues that dominant governance discourses relate problems arising within social housing to assumed distinctions in the cultural, social and symbolic capital ascribed to commodified and `branded' housing tenures, thereby marginalising the importance of differential access to economic capital in the conceptualisation of UK housing policy.
BibTeX record
RIS record