CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

On the use of superadditivity as a metric for characterizing multisensory integration in functional neuroimaging studies. Export

Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale, Vol. 166, No. 3-4. (October 2005), pp. 289-297.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


BBoyButzemann's tags for this article

anti_fmri fmri superadditivity

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

A growing number of brain imaging studies are being undertaken in order to better understand the contributions of multisensory processes to human behavior and perception. Many of these studies are designed on the basis of the physiological findings from single neurons in animal models, which have shown that multisensory neurons have the capacity for integrating their different sensory inputs and give rise to a product that differs significantly from either of the unisensory responses. At certain points these multisensory interactions can be superadditive, resulting in a neural response that exceeds the sum of the unisensory responses. Because of the difficulties inherent in interpreting the results of imaging large neuronal populations, superadditivity has been put forth as a stringent criterion for identifying potential sites of multisensory integration. In the present manuscript we discuss issues related to using the superadditive model in human brain imaging studies, focusing on population responses to multisensory stimuli and the relationship between single neuron measures and functional brain imaging measures. We suggest that the results of brain imaging studies be interpreted with caution in regards to multisensory integration. Future directions for imaging multisensory integration are discussed in light of the ideas presented.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.