![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
CGREALDisclosure's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Unexpected findings in identifiable stored blood samples after analysis without consent: moral arguments for and against disclosure.by: M. F. Verweij, B. C. Hamel
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractObtaining informed consent for using blood samples in research is mandatory. However, sometimes no consent is obtained for analysis of identifiable blood samples in a second study. As a result, a moral dilemma raises in case a possibly pathogenic mutation is found. Should the involved person be informed that such a mutation has been detected? We present a case in which this problem occurred and discuss arguments for and against information disclosure.
BibTeX record
RIS record