![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
CLLC's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Comonads, Coequations and Behavioural Covarietiesby: Ranald Clouston
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractCoalgebras are a category theoretic computer science, defined by an endofunctor T : C --> C over a category C. A class K of T-coalgebras is a covariety if it is closed under coproducts, codomains of epi coalgebraic morphisms and subcoalgebras, and a behavioural covariety if it is closed under images of bisimulations. Often the forgetful functor from the category of T-coalgebras to C has a right adjoint. This adjunction defines a comoad G^T. Goldblatt [11] investigated this situation oven the category Set, introducing the notion of a pure subcomonad of a comonad, and showing a bijective correspondence between (equivalence classes of) pure subcomonads of G^T and behavioural covarieties of T-coalgebras. This thesis demonstrates what restrictions need to be applied to an arbitrary category C and endofunctor T : C --> C to attain this bijection. All restrictions on C and T are shown to apply to an endofunctor ()^I on a sategory Set^\sub that is useful for modelling automata. The thesis goes on to show that pure subcomonads give rise to subcoalgebras of the final coalgebra called coequations over 1, and demonstrates a bijective correspondence between behavioural covarieties of T-coalgebras and coequations over 1. Finally the thesis shows that, given an extra assumption on C, there is a bijective correspondence between covarieties of T-coalgebras and a class of subcomonads called regulating subcomonads.
BibTeX record
RIS record