Register | Log in | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Reconstruction algorithm for wide cone beam helical CT

by: AA Zamyatin, K Taguchi, MD Silver
Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005 IEEE, Vol. 4 (2005), pp. 2278-2282.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

In practice cone beam CT reconstruction is often done using the approximate Feldkamp-type algorithms because of their flexibility and simplicity; however, when it comes to a 64- and higher detector row CT, they produce cone beam artifacts, and for 256+ detector-row CT image quality becomes unacceptable. The exact algorithms, on the other hand, produce artifact-free images but are much more computationally demanding and not very flexible in controlling noise/resolution trade-off. We propose a cone beam algorithm that can be easily adjusted depending on the cone angle. We tested it on 64-slice real data and 320-slice simulated data. For 64-slice CT it outperforms helical Feldkamp in both image quality and volume reconstruction speed; using the same redundancy weighting it reduces the cone beam artifact and improves noise uniformity. Because weighting is done after the convolution step, we can use the n-PI Tam-Danielson window, an exact cone beam weighting. We show that the weighting is more important than the filtering direction for image quality. The proposed method has good image quality without rebinning to tangential filtering lines. In evaluation we compare the proposed algorithm to helical Feldkamp and the 1-PI and 3-PI Katsevich algorithms.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.