CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

CASP9 results compared to those of previous casp experiments

by: Andriy Kryshtafovych, Krzysztof Fidelis, John Moult
Proteins, Vol. 79, No. S10. (1 January 2011), pp. 196-207, doi:10.1002/prot.23182  Key: citeulike:11123029

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The quality of structure models submitted to CASP9 is analyzed in the context of previous CASPs. Comparison methods are similar to those used in previous articles in this series, with the addition of new methods looking at model quality in regions not covered by a single best structural template, alignment accuracy, and progress for template-free models. Progress in this CASP was again modest and statistically hard to validate. Nevertheless, there are several positive trends. There is an indication of improvement in overall model quality for the midrange of template-based modeling difficulty, methods for identifying the best model from a set generated have improved, and there are strong indications of progress in the quality of template-free models of short proteins. In addition, the new examination of a model quality in regions of model not covered by the best available template reveals better performance than had previously been apparent. © Proteins 2011; © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


Cavor's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.