CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

A few bad votes too many?: towards robust ranking in social media Export

In AIRWeb '08: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Adversarial information retrieval on the web (2008), pp. 53-60.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


ChaTo's tags for this article

adversarial-ir tagging

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Online social media draws heavily on active reader participation, such as voting or rating of news stories, articles, or responses to a question. This user feedback is invaluable for ranking, filtering, and retrieving high quality content - tasks that are crucial with the explosive amount of social content on the web. Unfortunately, as social media moves into the mainstream and gains in popularity, the quality of the user feedback degrades. Some of this is due to noise, but, increasingly, a small fraction of malicious users are trying to "game the system" by selectively promoting or demoting content for profit, or fun. Hence, an effective ranking of social media content must be robust to noise in the user interactions, and in particular to vote spam. We describe a machine learning based ranking framework for social media that integrates user interactions and content relevance, and demonstrate its effec- tiveness for answer retrieval in a popular community question answering portal. We consider several vote spam attacks, and introduce a method of training our ranker to increase its robustness to some common forms of vote spam attacks. The results of our large-scale experimental evaluation show that our ranker is signifcicantly more robust to vote spam compared to a state-of-the-art baseline as well as the ranker not explicitly trained to handle malicious interactions.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.