![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
ChaTo's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Learning to tagIn WWW '09: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web (2009), pp. 361-370.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this article[Talk] Std. image search: query -> annotations (text/content/tags) -> images -> results.
Flickr tag distribution (more frequent to less frequent): uninformative, popular, specific, noise.
Three types of features for tag similarity: tag coocurrence + tag content correlation (among the text of tags, e.g. synonyms -- handled from PicNet distance ACM MM'09) + tag visual correlation (among images)
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractSocial tagging provides valuable and crucial information for large-scale web image retrieval. It is ontology-free and easy to obtain; however, irrelevant tags frequently appear, and users typically will not tag all semantic objects in the image, which is also called semantic loss. To avoid noises and compensate for the semantic loss, tag recommendation is proposed in literature. However, current recommendation simply ranks the related tags based on the single modality of tag co-occurrence on the whole dataset, which ignores other modalities, such as visual correlation. This paper proposes a multi-modality recommendation based on both tag and visual correlation, and formulates the tag recommendation as a learning problem. Each modality is used to generate a ranking feature, and Rankboost algorithm is applied to learn an optimal combination of these ranking features from different modalities. Experiments on Flickr data demonstrate the effectiveness of this learning-based multi-modality recommendation strategy.
BibTeX record
RIS record