CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence

by: Robert Klitzman
Journal of Medical Ethics (14 September 2012), doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100439  Key: citeulike:11372569

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Introduction Scholars have debated how to define coercion and undue influence, but how institutional review boards (IRBs) view and make decisions about these issues in actual cases has not been explored.


ErinC's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.