CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

REST and Web Services: In Theory and in Practice REST: From Research to Practice

by: Paul Adamczyk, Patrick H. Smith, Ralph E. Johnson, Munawar Hafiz

edited by: Erik Wilde, Cesare Pautasso

In REST: From Research to Practice (2011), pp. 35-57, doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-8303-9_2  Key: citeulike:11290574

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

There are two competing architectural styles employed for building Web services: RESTful services and services based on the WS– ∗ standards (also known as “SOAP Web services”). These two styles have separate follower bases, but many differences between them are ideological rather than factual. In order to promote the healthy growth of Web services research and practice, it is important to distinguish arguments for implementation practices over abstract concepts represented by these styles, carefully evaluating the respective advantages of RESTful and WS– ∗ Web services. Understanding these distinctions is especially critical for the development of enterprise systems, because in this domain, tool vendors have preferred WS– ∗ services to the neglect of RESTful solutions. This chapter evaluates some of the key questions regarding the real and perceived distinctions between these two styles of Web services. It analyzes how the current tools for building RESTful Web services embody the principles of REST. Finally, it presents select open research questions to further the growth of RESTful Web services.


FemkeDeBackere's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.