CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

The pursuit of genome-wide association studies: where are we now?

by: Chee S. Ku, En Y. Loy, Yudi Pawitan, Kee S. Chia
Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 55, No. 4. (19 March 2010), pp. 195-206, doi:10.1038/jhg.2010.19  Key: citeulike:7066867

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

It is now 5 years since the first genome-wide association studies (GWAS), published in 2005, identified a common risk allele with large effect size for age-related macular degeneration in a small sample set. Following this exciting finding, researchers have become optimistic about the prospect of the genome-wide association approach. However, most of the risk alleles identified in the subsequent GWAS for various complex diseases are common with small effect sizes (odds ratio <1.5). So far, more than 450 GWAS have been published and the associations of greater than 2000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or genetic loci were reported. The aim of this review paper is to give an overview of the evolving field of GWAS, discuss the progress that has been made by GWAS and some of the interesting findings, and summarize what we have learned over the past 5 years about the genetic basis of human complex diseases. This review will focus on GWAS of SNPs association for complex diseases but not studies of copy number variations.


Florenceg's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.