CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Variation in oxalic acid production and mycelial compatibility within field populations of

by: S. Durman, A. Menendez, A. Godeas
Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Vol. 37, No. 12. (December 2005), pp. 2180-2184, doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.017  Key: citeulike:11458648

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

This study was aimed at detecting mycelial compatibility groups and variations in oxalic acid production in Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. For this purpose, 121 isolates of this plant pathogen recovered from lettuce, soybean and sunflower field crops, and grouped in 46 MCGs were tested for their ability to release oxalic acid and other organic acids to the medium. Oxalic acid production on liquid media was measured spectrophotometrically and release of organic acids was estimated by isolate abilities to discolour solid media amended with bromophenol blue. There were significant differences among MCGs in both oxalic acid and organic acids releasing, ranging the mean production of oxalic acid between 18 and 110 Î¼g oxalic acid mg−1 dry wt. When isolates were grouped by their hosts, those obtained from soybean presented the highest release of oxalic acid (71 Î¼g oxalic acid mg−1 dry wt), while those from sunflower showed the highest release of other acids to the medium. Solid medium discoloration was not correlated with oxalic acid concentration in liquid medium (Spearman R=−0.085; P=0.126).


IIALUISG's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.