Please help support CiteULike by taking part in our marketing survey.
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Intense Paradoxes of Memory: Researching Moral Questions About Remembering the Socialist Past Export

History and Anthropology, Vol. 20, No. 2. (2009), pp. 183-199.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

ITS4ME has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

got

ITS4ME (public note) - 2009-10-13 14:53:55

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

In 2007 two researchers embarked upon a project on the social construction of the socialist past in eastern Germany. The project sought to explore how the socialist past is remembered today, and the moral ambiguities condensed in memories. This is particularly relevant in eastern Germany, where debates about how to interpret the socialist past continue to strive. However, it soon became apparent that doing such an ethnographic project is no easy task. Both researchers became sucked into the debates they sought to explore, including the question of who people had been during GDR (German Democratic Republic, former East Germany) times and whether this mattered. Using the ethnographic self as a resource, this article explores the ethics of complicity or detachment in fieldwork situations where the researcher was invited to make judgements. It argues that ethnographers need to address the question of value-judgements openly in their fieldwork, since they form an intrinsic part of all our humanity.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.