![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
ITS4ME's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Utopia, historiography, and the paradox of the ever-presentby: Toby Widdicombe
Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice, Vol. 13, No. 3. (2009), pp. 287-316.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Notes for this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractAfter describing the current crisis in historiography and defining utopianism, I look at theories of history from a utopian perspective. I do so by examining three central concepts (historical rupture, historical erasure, and historical fictionality) by means of three utopian texts Edward Bellamy's <i>Looking backward</i> (1888), Margaret Atwood's <i>The handmaid's tale</i> (1985), and Richard Gooch's <i>America and the Americans in 18334</i> (1834; 1995). I then move on to look at the practice of history in terms of these concepts with the Lewis and Clark expedition of 18046 as my analytical and exemplary focus. I conclude by suggesting how utopianism offers for historiography a way out of the paradox of the ever-present.
BibTeX record
RIS record