One-Phase Commit: Does it make sense

@misc{citeulike:942059, abstract = {Although widely used in distributed transactional systems, the so-called Two-Phase Commit (2PC) protocol introduces a substantial delay in transaction processing, even in the absence of failures. This has led several researchers to look for alternative commit protocols that minimize the time cost associated with coordination messages and forced log writes in 2PC. In particular, variations of a One-Phase Commit (1PC) protocol have recently been proposed. Although efficient, 1PC is however rarely ...}, author = {Abdallah, M. and Guerraoui, R. and Pucheral, P. }, citeulike-article-id = {942059}, keywords = {databases, distributed}, posted-at = {2006-11-13 19:44:22}, priority = {4}, title = {One-Phase Commit: Does it make sense}, url = {http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/abdallah98onephase.html}, year = {1998} }

TY - GEN ID - citeulike:942059 L3 - citeulike-article-id:942059 TI - One-Phase Commit: Does it make sense N2 - Although widely used in distributed transactional systems, the so-called Two-Phase Commit (2PC) protocol introduces a substantial delay in transaction processing, even in the absence of failures. This has led several researchers to look for alternative commit protocols that minimize the time cost associated with coordination messages and forced log writes in 2PC. In particular, variations of a One-Phase Commit (1PC) protocol have recently been proposed. Although efficient, 1PC is however rarely ... KW - databases KW - distributed AU - Abdallah, M AU - Guerraoui, R AU - Pucheral, P PY - 1998/// UR - http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/abdallah98onephase.html ER -