CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Performance comparison of Si-PM-based block detectors with different pixel sizes for an ultrahigh-resolution small-animal PET system

by: Seiichi Yamamoto, Hiroshi Watabe, Jun Hatazawa
Physics in Medicine and Biology, Vol. 56, No. 20. (21 September 2011), N227, doi:10.1088/0031-9155/56/20/n02  Key: citeulike:12002419

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The silicon photomultiplier (Si-PM) is a promising photodetector for a high-resolution PET scanner due to its small size, high gain and lower sensitivity to magnetic fields. There are several commercially available Si-PM arrays with different pixel sizes and fill factors, and these parameters can affect the performance of a PET block detector read out by these devices. We compared the performance of block detectors using 4 × 4 Si-PM arrays with 25 µm (Hamamatsu S11064-025P) and 50 µm (S11064-050P) pixels combined with the same 15 × 15 matrix LGSO block made of 0.7 × 0.7 × 6 mm 3 scintillator pixels. Evaluated characteristics include photopeak linearity, energy resolution and positioning performance. Although the photopeak linearity and energy resolution are slightly better for the Si-PM with 25 µm pixels, the position performance measured by the separation of the position histogram is significantly better for the Si-PM with 50 µm pixels. We conclude that using the Si-PM with 50 µm pixels will provide a better solution for the development of ultrahigh-resolution PET systems.


Kamioka's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.