![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
LVIS-BRD's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
A Comparison of Five Distance-Based Methods for Spatial Pattern Analysisby: Canran Liu
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe behaviour of five statistics (extensions of Pielou's, Clark and Evans', Pollard's, Johnson & Zimmer's, and Eberhardt's statistics, which are denoted as P<sub>i</sub>, C<sub>e</sub>, P<sub>o</sub>, J<sub>z</sub> and E<sub>b</sub> respectively) that involve the distance from a random point to its jth nearest neighbour were examined against several alternative patterns (lattice-based regular, inhomogeneous random, and Poisson cluster patterns) through Monte Carlo simulation to test their powers to detect patterns. The powers of all the five statistics increase as distance order j increases against inhomogeneous random pattern. They decrease for P<sub>i</sub> and C<sub>e</sub> and increase for P<sub>o</sub>, J<sub>z</sub>, and E<sub>b</sub> against regular and Poisson cluster patterns. P<sub>o</sub>, J<sub>z</sub> and E<sub>b</sub> can reach high powers with the third or higher order distances in most cases. However, P<sub>o</sub> is recommended because no extra information is needed, it can reach a high power with the second or third distance even though the sample size is not large in most cases, and the test can be performed with an approximate χ<sup>2</sup> distribution associated with it. When a regular pattern is expected, J<sub>z</sub> is recommended because it is more sensitive to lattice-based regular pattern than P<sub>o</sub> and E<sub>b</sub>, especially for the first distance. However, simulation tests should be used because the speed of convergence of J<sub>z</sub> to normal distribution is very slow.
BibTeX record
RIS record