![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
LuisSegoviano's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Does Hume Have a Theory of Justice?by: -David Reidy
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe paper first argues that Hume fails to establish a coherent connection between justice and self-interest, because he fails both to state explicitly what he means by self-interest and to consider plausible alternative origins of the artificial virtue of justice. The paper then argues that Hume's conception of justice may plausibly be traced to the power of a few operating indirectly through convention. The argument focuses upon Hume's failure to extend justice to those insufficiently powerful to pose a real threat to others and his erroneous assumption that every particular property regime will serve the self-interest of all because all do better with some property regime rather than no property regime.
BibTeX record
RIS record