CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Comparison of Pedestrian Fundamental Diagram Across Cultures Export

Advances in Complex Systems, Vol. 12, No. 03. (1 Mar 2009), pp. 393-405.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


MehdiMoussaid's tags for this article

crowd culture experiment fundamental-diagram pedestrian

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The relation between speed and density is connected with everyself-organization phenomenon of pedestrian dynamics and offers the opportunityto analyze them quantitatively. But even for the simplest systems, likepedestrian streams in corridors, this fundamental relation isn't completelyunderstood. Specifications of this characteristic in guidelines and text booksdiffer considerably reflecting the contradictory database and the controversialdiscussion documented in the literature. In this contribution it is studiedwhether cultural influences and length of the corridor can be the causes forthese deviations. To reduce as much as possible unintentioned effects, a systemis chosen with reduced degrees of freedom and thus the most simple system,namely the movement of pedestrians along a line under closed boundaryconditions. It is found that the speed of Indian test persons is less dependenton density than the speed of German test persons. Surprisingly the moreunordered behaviour of the Indians is more effective than the ordered behaviourof the Germans. Without any statistical measure one cannot conclude aboutwhether there are differences or not. By hypothesis test it is foundquantitatively that these differences exist, suggesting cultural differences inthe fundamental diagram of pedestrians.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.