CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Distributed control for radial loss network systems via the ash Certainty Equivalence (mean field) principle Export

Decision and Control, 2008. CDC 2008. 47th IEEE Conference on In Decision and Control, 2008. CDC 2008. 47th IEEE Conference on (2008), pp. 3829-3834.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


Mnourian's tags for this article

nash_certainty_equivalence networks

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The computational intractability of the dynamic programming (DP) equations associated with optimal admission and routing in stochastic loss networks of any non-trivial size (Ma et al., 2006, 2008) leads to the consideration of suboptimal distributed game theoretic formulations of the problem. This work presents a formulation of loss network admission control problems in terms of a class of systems composed of a large population of weakly coupled competitive individual agent networks. The resulting distributed dynamic stochastic game problem is solved and analyzed by application of the so-called point process Nash certainty equivalence (PPNCE) principle; this is an extension to the network point process context of the NCE principle originally formulated in the LQG framework by M. Huang et al., (2006, 2007). This methodology has close connections with the mean field models studied by Lasry and Lions (2006, 2007) and the notion of oblivious equilibrium proposed by Weintraub, Benkard, and Van Roy (2005, 2007) via a mean field approximation.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.