![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Mohan-S's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
A Survey on Transfer Learningby: Sinno J. Pan, Qiang Yang
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractA major assumption in many machine learning and data mining systems is that the data must be from the same feature representations and that the data distributions in the training and test data are the same. However, in many real-world applications, this assumption does not hold. For example, we sometimes have a classification task in one task domain, but we only have sufficient training data in another task domain where the data may be in a different feature space or follow a different distribution. In these cases, knowledge transfer, if done successfully, would greatly benefit learning in our interested domain by avoiding expensive data labeling tasks. In recent years, transfer learning has emerged as a new technique to address this problem. This survey focuses on categorizing and reviewing the current progress on transfer learning for classification, regression and clustering problems. We discuss the relationship between transfer learning and other related research areas, such as domain adaptation, multi-task learning and sample selection bias as well as co-variate shift, and explore some potential future problems in knowledge transfer research.
BibTeX record
RIS record