Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks. Export

@article{citeulike:665628, abstract = {Inhibition is a widely used notion proposed to account for data obtained in choice reaction time (RT) tasks. However, this concept is weakly supported by empirical facts. In this paper, we review a series of experiments using Hoffman reflex, transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography to study inhibition in choice RT tasks. We provide empirical support for the idea that inhibition does occur during choice RT, and the implications of those findings for various classes of choice RT models are discussed.}, address = {Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de la Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Universit\'{e} de Provence, Marseille, France. boris.burle@up.univ-mrs.fr}, author = {Burle, B. and Vidal, F. and Tandonnet, C. and Hasbroucq, T.}, citeulike-article-id = {665628}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.004}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15518932}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=15518932}, comment = {"However, most behavioral results interpreted in terms of inhibition can as well be explained in alternative ways, and inhibition in choice RT is a compelling theoretical construct weakly supported at the empirical level. In other words, inhibition is insufficiently constrained to constitute a valid heuristics and, in spite of its explanatory value, response inhibition in choice RT has not yet received strong empirical support. It remains in fact a theoretical notion, or in other words a vue de l'esprit."}, doi = {10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.004}, issn = {0278-2626}, journal = {Brain Cogn}, keywords = {challenge\_for\_monitoring, monitoring, problems\_with\_inhibition\_accounts, response\_inhibition, ssrt}, month = {November}, number = {2}, pages = {153--164}, posted-at = {2007-03-06 16:32:14}, priority = {2}, title = {Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.004}, volume = {56}, year = {2004} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:665628 L3 - citeulike-article-id:665628 N2 - Inhibition is a widely used notion proposed to account for data obtained in choice reaction time (RT) tasks. However, this concept is weakly supported by empirical facts. In this paper, we review a series of experiments using Hoffman reflex, transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography to study inhibition in choice RT tasks. We provide empirical support for the idea that inhibition does occur during choice RT, and the implications of those findings for various classes of choice RT models are discussed. IS - 2 JF - Brain Cogn SN - 0278-2626 AD - Laboratoire de Neurobiologie de la Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Université de Provence, Marseille, France. boris.burle@up.univ-mrs.fr EP - 164 TI - Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks. VL - 56 SP - 153 KW - challenge_for_monitoring KW - monitoring KW - problems_with_inhibition_accounts KW - response_inhibition KW - ssrt N1 - "However, most behavioral results interpreted in terms of inhibition can as well be explained in alternative ways, and inhibition in choice RT is a compelling theoretical construct weakly supported at the empirical level. In other words, inhibition is insufficiently constrained to constitute a valid heuristics and, in spite of its explanatory value, response inhibition in choice RT has not yet received strong empirical support. It remains in fact a theoretical notion, or in other words a vue de l’esprit." AU - Burle, B AU - Vidal, F AU - Tandonnet, C AU - Hasbroucq, T PY - 2004/11// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.004 ER -