CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Cognitive tools, individual differences, and group processing as mediating factors in a hypermedia environment Export

Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 22, No. 2. (March 2006), pp. 295-319.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


MorganHill's tags for this article

cogntive

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Much research exists on how problem-solving in hypermedia is assisted through the use of navigational aids. However, as hypermedia becomes more pedagogically rich, the structural characteristics of hypermedia no longer serve merely as navigational aids, but often as cognitive tools. When cognitive tools are embedded in problem-solving hypermedia environments, the objective is the continuous active manipulation of cognitive tools in the problem space in order to gather information, test hypotheses, and develop a solution. The purpose of this study was to investigate cognitive tools, individual differences, and group processing as mediating factors when learners were engaged in problem-solving in a hypermedia environment. We specifically examined group patterns of cognitive tool use to determine in what ways the group patterns of tool use may affect students' individual performance and experience of the problem-solving process. The findings provided some evidence to support a more contextual approach to individual cognition and learning; and emphasized the notion that a system of instructional variables interact to create optimal conditions for learning.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.