CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis

by: Marie-Agnès Dillies, Andrea Rau, Julie Aubert, Christelle Hennequet-Antier, Marine Jeanmougin, Nicolas Servant, Céline Keime, Guillemette Marot, David Castel, Jordi Estelle, Gregory Guernec, Bernd Jagla, Luc Jouneau, Denis Laloë, Caroline Le Gall, Brigitte Schaëffer, Stéphane Le Crom, Mickaël Guedj, Florence Jaffrézic
Briefings in Bioinformatics (17 September 2012), doi:10.1093/bib/bbs046  Key: citeulike:11270203

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

During the last 3 years, a number of approaches for the normalization of RNA sequencing data have emerged in the literature, differing both in the type of bias adjustment and in the statistical strategy adopted. However, as data continue to accumulate, there has been no clear consensus on the appropriate normalization method to be used or the impact of a chosen method on the downstream analysis. In this work, we focus on a comprehensive comparison of seven recently proposed normalization methods for the differential analysis of RNA-seq data, with an emphasis on the use of varied real and simulated datasets involving different species and experimental designs to represent data characteristics commonly observed in practice. Based on this comparison study, we propose practical recommendations on the appropriate normalization method to be used and its impact on the differential analysis of RNA-seq data.


NGS_Array_References's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.