CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Nonoperative treatment of spondylolysis and grade I spondylolisthesis in children and young adults: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Export

Journal of pediatric orthopedics, Vol. 29, No. 2. (March 2009), pp. 146-156.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


NIlz's tags for this article

backpain xrw

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of spondylolysis is at least 6% by the end of childhood, and painful lesions are not infrequent. The most common treatments for spondylolysis are nonoperative in nature and include bracing, activity restriction, and therapeutic exercises. These treatments have been used either alone or in concert. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the evidence from the literature on the effectiveness of nonoperative treatment for spondylolysis (including those with up to 25% spondylolisthesis) in children and young adults. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified articles meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) the target population was children and young adults with spondylolysis (including those with up to 25% spondylolisthesis); (2) the treatment intervention was nonoperative; (3) minimum follow-up was 1 year in studies using clinical parameters as the primary outcome; and (4) the studies included at least 10 subjects. Outcome data from eligible studies were pooled into 1 of 2 groups: clinical outcome or radiographic evidence of a union of the pars defects. RESULTS: Fifteen observational studies measuring the clinical outcome had a weighted and pooled success rate of 83.9% in 665 patients. A subgroup analysis comparing the clinical outcome of patients treated with a brace to patients treated without a brace was not significantly different (P=0.75). Ten studies evaluating radiographic healing of the defects had a pooled success rate of 28.0% (n=847). A subgroup analysis showed that unilateral defects healed at a pooled and weighted rate of 71% (n=92), significantly more than bilateral defects at 18.1% (n=446, P<0.0001). An additional subgroup analysis showed acute defects healed at a rate of 68.1% (n=236), significantly more than progressive lesions (28.3%, n=224, P<0.0001) and terminal lesions (n=217, P<0.0001), of which not one defect healed. CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of observational studies suggests that 83.9% of patients treated nonoperatively will have a successful clinical outcome after at least 1 year. Bracing does not seem to influence this outcome. In contrast to the high rate of success with clinical parameters, most defects did not heal with nonoperative treatment suggesting that a successful clinical outcome does not depend on healing of the lesion. Lesions diagnosed at the acute stage were more likely to heal after nonoperative treatment as were unilateral defects when compared with bilateral defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of level IV studies. Therapeutic level IV.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.