PredictER's Press:N [2 articles] Export Sort

Recent papers posted to PredictER's library by the author Press:N. You can also see everyone's Press:N.

Sort by:
Order:	Default Ascending Descending
Empty fields:	Default First Last

Hide details Show details

Genetic information: Special or not? Responses from focus groups with members of a health maintenance organization. [My Copy]

Am J Med Genet A, Vol. 143, No. 6. (15 March 2007), pp. 564-569.

by B. Diergaarde, D. J. Bowen, E. J. Ludman, J. O. Culver, N. Press, W. Burke

posted to confidentiality focus-groups genetic-information hmo privacy by PredictER on 2007-11-06 03:10:45 as

along with 1 person jasonbobe

Genetics as a tool to improve cancer outcomes: ethics and policy [My Copy]

Nature Reviews Cancer, Vol. 6, No. 6., pp. 476-482.

by Wylie Burke, Nancy Press

posted to cancer elsi genetic-research genetic-testing by PredictER on 2007-11-06 03:08:46 as

along with 1 person and 1 group cgreal CGREL

Note: You may cite this page as: http://www.citeulike.org/user/PredictER/author/Press:N

PredictER's tags

All tags in PredictER's library

Filter:

[Display as Cloud] [Display as List]

biobanks	86
genetic-testing	81
genetic-research	71
elsi	58
attitudes	45
genetic-information	42
informed-consent	39
genomics	34
personalized-medicine	25
research-ethics	25
privacy	25
ethical-issues	22
policy	21
risk	20
disclosure	19
legislation-and-jurisprudence	18
cancer	18
genetic-medicine	15
pediatric-research	14
direct-to-consumer	13
pharmacogenetics	12
pgd	12
genetic-counseling	11
ownership	11
predictive-health	11
survey-research	10
law	10
reproductive-technologies	10
irb	10
review	10
medical-records	10
risk-and-behavior	9
dna	9
pediatrics	9
research-participants	8
translational-research	8
public-engagement	8
pharmacogenomics	8
insurance	8
discrimination	8
gwas	8
epidemiology	7
health-professionals	7
decision-making	7
gina	7
tissue	7
patients	6
editorial	6
ethnicity	6
participants	6
population-research	6
genetic-databases	6
international-research	6
bioethics	6
letter	6
neurology	5
property	5
religion	5
public-health	5
public-opinion	5
personal-genomics	5
clinical-ethics	5
genetics	5
families	5
biotechnology	5
newborn-screening	5
confidentiality	5
hipaa	5
autonomy	4
eugenics	4
industry	4
clinical-trials	4
race	4
cardiovascular-disease	4
addiction	4
human-rights	4
european-union	4
huntingtons	4
african-americans	4
research-design	4
reproductive-medicine	4
commerce	4
population-genetics	4
databases	4
comment	4
patents	4
psychiatric-research	3
indiana-university	3
public-policy	3
data-mining	3
communication	3
women	3
gender	3
anonymized-research	3
genetic-discrimination	3
longitudinal-studies	3
cystic-fibrosis	3
blood	3
europe	3
eugenic-abortion	3
developing-countries	3
indigenous-populations	3
business-ethics	3
psychiatry	3
nutrigenomics	3
biomarkers	3
justice	3
uk	3
survey	3
human-genome-project	2
hugenet	2
smoking	2
sweden	2
employment	2
unesco	2
venter	2
public-participation	2
nursing	2
cohorts	2
organization-and-administration	2
alzheimers	2
asthma	2
resource-sharing	2
genetic-engineering	2
nhanes	2
continental-population-groups	2
intellectual-property	2
hemochromatosis	2
genetic-resources	2
islam	2
evidenced-based-medicine	2
governance	2
genetic-enhancement	2
case-studies	2
web-30	2
japan	2
drug-development	2
research-methodology	2
germany	2
interdisciplinary-research	2
news	2
predicter	2
genome-sequencing	2
community	2
oversight	2
duty-to-recontact	2
native-americans	2
legislation	2
uk-biobank	2
health-information	2
commentary	2
netherlands	1
integrity	1
semantic-web	1
australia	1
ped	1
hugo	1
pregnancy	1
fmri	1
interviews	1
psychiatrics	1
nanotechnology	1
conflict-of-interest	1
cdc	1
reproduction	1
online-resources	1
health-services-accessibility	1
interview	1
allocation-of-care	1
fda	1
personal-genome-project	1
brca	1
taxes	1
metrics	1
mass-media	1
history_science	1
social-bookmarking	1
honore	1
consultation	1
disability-insurance	1
veterans-affairs	1
predisposition	1
stigma	1
gene-environment-interaction	1
pancreatitis	1
future	1
genealogy	1
pregnancy-rate	1
focus-groups	1
caulfield-t	1
liability	1
sibling-donors	1
outcomes	1
indiana	1
advocacy	1
informatics	1
engaging-community	1
helsinki	1
web-20	1
bidil	1
health-insurance	1
university-industry-research-relationships	1
equality	1
birth-defects	1
evidence-based-medicine	1
public-relations	1
bioinformatics	1
france	1
information-technology	1
science-communication	1
transplants	1
academic-literature	1
diabetes	1
india	1
history-of-genetics	1
organ-donation	1
empirical-ethics	1
diagnostic-imaging	1
enhancement	1
myriad	1
trends	1
academic-networks	1
encode	1
fragile-x	1
demographics	1
book-chapter	1
questionnaires	1
taiwan	1
marketing	1
surveys	1
als	1
case-control-study	1
turkey	1
blanket-consent	1
re-consent	1
environmental-health	1
nicotine	1
alder-hey	1
parkinson	1
hmo	1
cord-blood	1
stem-cells	1
deafness	1
book-review	1
disability	1
china	1
newgeneris	1
health-policy	1
students	1
myspace	1
haemochromatosis	1
advisory	1
groups	1
nih	1
warfarin	1
social-networks	1
bibliography	1
biodiversity	1
research-standards	1
counseling	1
iceland	1
ivf	1
hapmap	1
connotea	1
canada	1
uganda	1
health-costs	1
asia	1
malpractice	1
israel	1
hawaaiians	1
research-efficiency	1
mitochondrial-disorders	1
prediction	1
screening	1
politics	1
ethics	1
molecular-diagnosis	1

CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.