CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Governance and trust in higher education

by: Lesley Vidovich, Jan Currie
Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 36, No. 1. (15 September 2010), pp. 43-56, doi:10.1080/03075070903469580  Key: citeulike:8757003

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

The adoption of more corporate models of governance is a contemporary trend in higher education. In the early 2000s, the Australian Government legislated national governance protocols for universities, using the policy lever of financial sanctions. These more corporate?style governance protocols followed similar changes in the UK, consistent with a historical pattern of Australia borrowing policy ?on trust? from its former colonial ruler. However, the Australian approach represented much tighter government regulation than in the UK. This article employs a conceptual lens of trust to analyse changing policy on governance in Australian higher education. Analysis reveals that national governance protocols contributed to a culture of mistrust across the sector, although the dynamics of trust?mistrust relationships were complex and included apparent trust ?settlements? between particular stakeholder groups. This analysis offers another step in nascent investigations into trust and the governance of higher education. The adoption of more corporate models of governance is a contemporary trend in higher education. In the early 2000s, the Australian Government legislated national governance protocols for universities, using the policy lever of financial sanctions. These more corporate?style governance protocols followed similar changes in the UK, consistent with a historical pattern of Australia borrowing policy ?on trust? from its former colonial ruler. However, the Australian approach represented much tighter government regulation than in the UK. This article employs a conceptual lens of trust to analyse changing policy on governance in Australian higher education. Analysis reveals that national governance protocols contributed to a culture of mistrust across the sector, although the dynamics of trust?mistrust relationships were complex and included apparent trust ?settlements? between particular stakeholder groups. This analysis offers another step in nascent investigations into trust and the governance of higher education.


SEANRICH002's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.