Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition Export

@article{citeulike:4860299, abstract = {This article reviews a diverse set of proposals for dual processing in higher cognition within largely disconnected literatures in cognitive and social psychology. All these theories have in common the distinction between cognitive processes that are fast, automatic, and unconscious and those that are slow, deliberative, and conscious. A number of authors have recently suggested that there may be two architecturally (and evolutionarily) distinct cognitive systems underlying these dual-process accounts. However, it emerges that (a) there are multiple kinds of implicit processes described by different theorists and (b) not all of the proposed attributes of the two kinds of processing can be sensibly mapped on to two systems as currently conceived. It is suggested that while some dual-process theories are concerned with parallel competing processes involving explicit and implicit knowledge systems, others are concerned with the influence of preconscious processes that contextualize and shape deliberative reasoning and decision-making.}, author = {Jonathan St}, citeulike-article-id = {4860299}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629}, doi = {10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629}, journal = {Annual Review of Psychology}, keywords = {affective-neuroscience, behavioral-theories, biases, bottom-up, brain-theories, contextuality, deciding, deliberative, deliberativity, emotions, filtering, free-will, intensionality, intuitive, intuitivity, neuromodulating, personality-theories, preprocessing, rationality, reactive, reactivity, selecting, signal-processing, thinking, top-down}, number = {1}, pages = {255--278}, posted-at = {2009-07-09 09:57:33}, priority = {2}, title = {Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629}, volume = {59}, year = {2008} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:4860299 L3 - citeulike-article-id:4860299 N2 - This article reviews a diverse set of proposals for dual processing in higher cognition within largely disconnected literatures in cognitive and social psychology. All these theories have in common the distinction between cognitive processes that are fast, automatic, and unconscious and those that are slow, deliberative, and conscious. A number of authors have recently suggested that there may be two architecturally (and evolutionarily) distinct cognitive systems underlying these dual-process accounts. However, it emerges that (a) there are multiple kinds of implicit processes described by different theorists and (b) not all of the proposed attributes of the two kinds of processing can be sensibly mapped on to two systems as currently conceived. It is suggested that while some dual-process theories are concerned with parallel competing processes involving explicit and implicit knowledge systems, others are concerned with the influence of preconscious processes that contextualize and shape deliberative reasoning and decision-making. IS - 1 JF - Annual Review of Psychology EP - 278 TI - Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition VL - 59 SP - 255 KW - affective-neuroscience KW - behavioral-theories KW - biases KW - bottom-up KW - brain-theories KW - contextuality KW - deciding KW - deliberative KW - deliberativity KW - emotions KW - filtering KW - free-will KW - intensionality KW - intuitive KW - intuitivity KW - neuromodulating KW - personality-theories KW - preprocessing KW - rationality KW - reactive KW - reactivity KW - selecting KW - signal-processing KW - thinking KW - top-down AU - Jonathan St PY - 2008/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 ER -