CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Shoot structure, canopy openness, and light interception in Norway spruce Export

Plant, Cell & Environment (September 1999), pp. 1133-1142.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


Stockman's tags for this article

canopy-openness light nitrogen shade-acclimation shoot

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

We analysed changes in shoot structure with canopy openness in control (C) and irrigated-fertilized (IL) Picea abies trees. Canopy openness, which was used to characterize light availability, varied between 0·23 and 0·90 for C shoots and 0·07 to 0·75 for IL shoots. Needle width and thickness increased with canopy openness, but were similar for C and IL needles. The ratio of needle thickness to width remained fairly close to one throughout the canopy. This resulted in large values (3·0-4·0) of the ratio of total to projected needle area. The ratio of total to projected needle area did not correlate with canopy openness. Shoot silhouette to total needle area ratio (STAR) and specific needle area decreased with canopy openness. As a result, shoot silhouette area per unit needle mass was up to three times larger in shade shoots than in sun shoots. STAR and specific needle area were similar for C and IL shoots and needles. Needle nitrogen concentration varied between 0·7 and 1·1% (C), and between 1·0 and 1·6% (IL). On both plots, nitrogen content was linearly related to estimated relative light interceptance (RLI) (both expressed per needle area), but the ratio of nitrogen content to RLI increased with decreasing canopy openness.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.