A Framework for Open Source Export

@misc{citeulike:1705244, abstract = {The historical roots of Open Source are outlined. A comparison between Open Source projects and classical projects highlights strengths and weaknesses of both, and defines their attributes. Existing Open Source theories are evaluated, and the requirements for a framework for Open Source projects are determined. The framework introduces the notions of actors, roles, areas, processes and tools, and depicts their interrelationships in a matrix. Each aspect of the framework is then further...}, author = {Rothfuss, Gregor J.}, citeulike-article-id = {1705244}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.12.6147}, keywords = {cross-discipline, floss, nature}, posted-at = {2007-09-28 16:16:19}, priority = {2}, title = {A Framework for Open Source}, url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.12.6147} }

TY - GEN ID - citeulike:1705244 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1705244 N2 - The historical roots of Open Source are outlined. A comparison between Open Source projects and classical projects highlights strengths and weaknesses of both, and defines their attributes. Existing Open Source theories are evaluated, and the requirements for a framework for Open Source projects are determined. The framework introduces the notions of actors, roles, areas, processes and tools, and depicts their interrelationships in a matrix. Each aspect of the framework is then further... TI - A Framework for Open Source KW - cross-discipline KW - floss KW - nature AU - Rothfuss, Gregor UR - http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.12.6147 ER -