CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Out-of-hospital administration of activated charcoal by emergency medical services. Export

Ann Emerg Med, Vol. 45, No. 2. (February 2005), pp. 207-212.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


Terkko's tags for this article

charcoal emergency-medical-services

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess the feasibility of activated charcoal provided by emergency medical services (EMS). METHODS: This was a 12-month follow-up study on the feasibility of a newly introduced protocol to administer activated charcoal by EMS to acutely poisoned patients before arrival at the hospital. Administration of activated charcoal (50 g or 1 g/kg orally or by nasogastric tube) was considered in 2,047 patients with acute poisoning. Main outcome measures were success rate and elapsed times in and adverse effects of administering charcoal. RESULTS: Activated charcoal was considered to be an indication for 722 patients (35% of the study population) and was administered to 555 patients. Median elapsed time from poison ingestion to activated charcoal administration was 88 minutes, and median time from activated charcoal administration to hospital arrival was 20 minutes. Activated charcoal was not given to 101 (15.4%) patients, although considered indicated, because of patient refusal (n=72), inability to ingest a charcoal mixture (n=23), technical problems (n=4), or recommendation by the hospital after telephone consultation (n=2). Charcoal caused no reported adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Out-of-hospital activated charcoal administration by EMS is feasible, even in severe poisonings. Adverse events were rare.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.