![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
Ubiquitousuk's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
Auctions With Aftermarket for Budget Constrained Biddersby: Masili Gustavo
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe paper compares di¤erent auction formats for sale of a single patented innovation for budget constrained bidders. This unit decreases the marginal cost of production in the aftermarket for its owner by an amount which de- pends on the money invested on the development of this technology. As the bidders have a xed budget that must be used to pay the nal auction price and also to develop the new technology, the winner has incentives to pay a low amount for his unit to increase the amount available to invest in cost reduction. Conversely the loser has incentives to induce induce a higher price to be paid by the winner in order to increase aftermarket prots. This conict of interest generates the willingness to pay (WTP) for the patent through an endogenous process, which may end up by stablishing a higher WTP for the lowest nanced rm. Given this background, the case in which the players have di¤erent initial budgets may generate multiple equilibria for all studied auction mechanisms. These equilibria produce di¤erent consumer surplus and, thus, a central government with an unti-trust behavior is able to choose the auction that generates the rened equilibrium leading to the highest consumer surplus.
BibTeX record
RIS record