Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement. Export

@article{citeulike:5121682, abstract = {BACKGROUND: There is substantial evidence that methylphenidate (MPH; Ritalin), is being used by healthy university students for non-medical motives such as the improvement of concentration, alertness, and academic performance. The scope and potential consequences of the non-medical use of MPH upon healthcare and society bring about many points of view. METHODS: To gain insight into key ethical and social issues on the non-medical use of MPH, we examined discourses in the print media, bioethics literature, and public health literature. RESULTS: Our study identified three diverging paradigms with varying perspectives on the nature of performance enhancement. The beneficial effects of MPH on normal cognition were generally portrayed enthusiastically in the print media and bioethics discourses but supported by scant information on associated risks. Overall, we found a variety of perspectives regarding ethical, legal and social issues related to the non-medical use of MPH for performance enhancement and its impact upon social practices and institutions. The exception to this was public health discourse which took a strong stance against the non-medical use of MPH typically viewed as a form of prescription abuse or misuse. Wide-ranging recommendations for prevention of further non-medical use of MPH included legislation and increased public education. CONCLUSION: Some positive portrayals of the non-medical use of MPH for performance enhancement in the print media and bioethics discourses could entice further uses. Medicine and society need to prepare for more prevalent non-medical uses of neuropharmaceuticals by fostering better informed public debates.}, author = {Forlini, Cynthia and Racine, Eric}, citeulike-article-id = {5121682}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-10-9}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19580661}, citeulike-linkout-2 = {http://www.hubmed.org/display.cgi?uids=19580661}, day = {06}, doi = {10.1186/1472-6939-10-9}, issn = {1472-6939}, journal = {BMC medical ethics}, keywords = {academic\_performance, methylphenidate, neuro-enhancement, neuroethics, ritalin}, month = {July}, pages = {9+}, posted-at = {2009-09-09 16:28:28}, priority = {2}, title = {Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-10-9}, volume = {10}, year = {2009} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:5121682 L3 - citeulike-article-id:5121682 N2 - BACKGROUND: There is substantial evidence that methylphenidate (MPH; Ritalin), is being used by healthy university students for non-medical motives such as the improvement of concentration, alertness, and academic performance. The scope and potential consequences of the non-medical use of MPH upon healthcare and society bring about many points of view. METHODS: To gain insight into key ethical and social issues on the non-medical use of MPH, we examined discourses in the print media, bioethics literature, and public health literature. RESULTS: Our study identified three diverging paradigms with varying perspectives on the nature of performance enhancement. The beneficial effects of MPH on normal cognition were generally portrayed enthusiastically in the print media and bioethics discourses but supported by scant information on associated risks. Overall, we found a variety of perspectives regarding ethical, legal and social issues related to the non-medical use of MPH for performance enhancement and its impact upon social practices and institutions. The exception to this was public health discourse which took a strong stance against the non-medical use of MPH typically viewed as a form of prescription abuse or misuse. Wide-ranging recommendations for prevention of further non-medical use of MPH included legislation and increased public education. CONCLUSION: Some positive portrayals of the non-medical use of MPH for performance enhancement in the print media and bioethics discourses could entice further uses. Medicine and society need to prepare for more prevalent non-medical uses of neuropharmaceuticals by fostering better informed public debates. JF - BMC medical ethics SN - 1472-6939 TI - Disagreements with implications: diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement. VL - 10 SP - 9 KW - academic_performance KW - methylphenidate KW - neuro-enhancement KW - neuroethics KW - ritalin AU - Forlini, Cynthia AU - Racine, Eric PY - 2009/07/06/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-10-9 ER -