Buying Supermajorities

@article{citeulike:3370870, abstract = {Minimal winning coalitions have appeared as a key prediction or as an essential assumption of virtually all formal models of coalition formation, vote buying, and logrolling. Notwithstanding this research, we provide a model showing that supermajority coalitions may be cheaper than minimal winning coalitions. Specifically, if vote buyers move sequentially, and if the losing vote buyer is always granted a last chance to attack the winner's coalition, then minimal winning coalitions will generally not be cheapest, and equilibrium coalitions will generally not be minimal winning. We provide results relating equilibrium coalition size with preferences of the legislators and vote buyers, and we show that minimal winning coalitions should occur in only rare cases. We discuss these results in light of empirical work on coalition size and suggest other possible avenues for testing our model.}, author = {Groseclose, Tim and Snyder, James M.}, citeulike-article-id = {3370870}, doi = {10.2307/2082886}, issn = {00030554}, journal = {The American Political Science Review}, keywords = {coalition, legislature, political\_economy}, number = {2}, pages = {303--315}, posted-at = {2008-10-03 13:38:28}, priority = {4}, publisher = {American Political Science Association}, title = {Buying Supermajorities}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082886}, volume = {90}, year = {1996} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:3370870 L3 - citeulike-article-id:3370870 N2 - Minimal winning coalitions have appeared as a key prediction or as an essential assumption of virtually all formal models of coalition formation, vote buying, and logrolling. Notwithstanding this research, we provide a model showing that supermajority coalitions may be cheaper than minimal winning coalitions. Specifically, if vote buyers move sequentially, and if the losing vote buyer is always granted a last chance to attack the winner's coalition, then minimal winning coalitions will generally not be cheapest, and equilibrium coalitions will generally not be minimal winning. We provide results relating equilibrium coalition size with preferences of the legislators and vote buyers, and we show that minimal winning coalitions should occur in only rare cases. We discuss these results in light of empirical work on coalition size and suggest other possible avenues for testing our model. IS - 2 JF - The American Political Science Review SN - 00030554 EP - 315 TI - Buying Supermajorities PB - American Political Science Association VL - 90 SP - 303 KW - coalition KW - legislature KW - political_economy AU - Groseclose, Tim AU - Snyder, James PY - 1996/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082886 ER -