CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Estimating species number under an inconvenient abundance model

by: AndrewR Solow, WoollcottK Smith
In Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, Vol. 14, No. 2. (2009), pp. 242-252, doi:10.1198/jabes.2009.0015  Key: citeulike:11862017

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Estimating the number of species in a biological community based on a multinomial sample of individual organisms is a classical problem in statistical ecology. A central issue in parametric estimation is the specification of a model of the relative abundances of species given their number. A common approach to this problem is to assume that relative abundances follow a symmetric Dirichlet distribution. This is mathematically convenient but is unconnected to work by ecologists on abundance distributions in real communities. In this article we describe ML estimation based on the sequential broken stick model that has been proposed for abundances. This model is defined mechanistically, requiring that the likelihood be approximated numerically. For this to be feasible, the likelihood must be based on a small number of summary statistics. We present simulation results that show that the observed number of species and the observed number of species represented by a single individual is a reasonable set of summary statistics on which to base estimation. We apply the method to two published data sets, one involving insect species on Mount Kenya and the other involving spider species in an Appalachian forest.


Zephyrus's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.