CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Test-driving static analysis tools in search of C code vulnerabilities

by: George Chatzieleftheriou, Panagiotis Katsaros
  Key: citeulike:11870692

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Abstract â Recently, a number of tools for automated code scanning came in the limelight. Due to the significant costs associated with incorporating such a tool in the software lifecycle, it is important to know what defects are detected and how accurate and efficient the analysis is. We focus specifically on popular static analysis tools for C code defects. Existing benchmarks include the actual defects in open source programs, but they lack systematic coverage of possible code defects and the coding complexities in which they arise. We introduce a test suite implementing the discussed requirements for frequent defects selected from public catalogues. Four open source and two commercial tools are compared in terms of their effectiveness and efficiency of their detection capability. A wide range of C constructs is taken into account and appropriate metrics are computed, which show how the tools balance inherent analysis tradeoffs and efficiency. The results are useful for identifying the appropriate tool, in terms of costeffectiveness, while the proposed methodology and test suite may be reused. Keywords-static analysis; software security; benchmark tests I.


_Anne_'s tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.