We define a new, intuitive measure for evaluating machine translation output that avoids the knowledge intensiveness of more meaning-based approaches, and the labor-intensiveness of human judgments. Translation Error Rate (TER) measures the amount of editing that a human would have to perform to change a system output so it exactly matches a reference translation. We also compute a human-targeted TER (or HTER), where the minimum TER of the translation is computed against a human ?targeted reference? that preserves the meaning (provided by the reference translations) and is fluent, but is chosen to minimize the TER score for a particular system output. We show that: (1) The single-reference variant of TER correlates as well with human judgments of MT quality as the four-reference variant of BLEU; (2) The human-targeted HTER yields a 33% error-rate reduction and is shown to be very well correlated with human judgments; (3) The four-reference variant of TER and the single-reference variant of HTER yield higher correlations with human judgments than BLEU; (4) HTER yields higher correlations with human judgments than METEOR or its human-targeted variant (HMETEOR); and (5) The four-reference variant of TER correlates as well with a single human judgment as a second human judgment does, while HTER, HBLEU, and HMETEOR correlate significantly better with a human judgment than a second human judgment does.
Search
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
