CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion Export

British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 38, No. 2. (March 2007), pp. 260-271.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


aditomo's tags for this article

asynchronous_discussion content_analysis factors_affecting_cscl

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

aditomo has 1 private note and 0 public notes for this article. If you are aditomo then you can log in to see the private note.

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

In this case study, we examined the influence of five groups of communication activities on the quality of students' contributions to online discussion. The activities were the nominal group technique, debate, invited expert, WebQuest and reflective deliberation. Quality of discussion was operationalised as cognitive presence, a construct developed to investigate the role of critical discourse in higher, distance education contexts. Using the quantitative content analysis technique, the postings of 19 students in an undergraduate university course were assigned to one of the four categories of cognitive presence. Across the five activities, the proportion and number of contributions categorised in the highest phases of cognitive presence was low (20.21%), but was highest during the Webquest and debate activities. There are three advantageous qualities of these two activities, we argue: 1. They were well structured. 2. They provided clearly defined roles and responsibilities for the students. 3. They provoked the students to explicitly confront others' opinions.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.