CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density

by: Valentina Assi, Jane Warwick, Jack Cuzick, Stephen W. Duffy
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, Vol. 9, No. 1. (06 December 2011), pp. 33-40, doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.173  Key: citeulike:11277191

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

High mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, and of all known breast cancer risk factors has the greatest attributable fraction. Mammographic density is estimated to account for 16% of all breast cancers, but can be altered by endogenous and exogenous hormonal factors, and generally declines with age. Confounding factors such as age, parity, menopausal status and BMI make the interpretation of mammographic density particularly challenging. Furthermore, none of the established means of measuring mammographic density are entirely satisfactory because they are time consuming or subjective. It is hoped that by adding information regarding mammographic density to existing models of breast cancer risk assessment, the accuracy of individual risk assessments can be improved. Although mammographic density has clearly been shown to be a powerful factor for predicting the risk of developing breast cancer, its potential role in assessing hormonal preventive regimens and helping to tailor screening algorithms cannot be fully realized until we have more-precise, simple and reproducible density measures.


ajaymalik's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

Xnote Notes for this article (1 public)


X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.