CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Appropriate number of plasma exchanges in Guillain-Barré syndrome. The French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange in Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

Annals of neurology, Vol. 41, No. 3. (March 1997), pp. 298-306, doi:10.1002/ana.410410304  Key: citeulike:11865610

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Plasma exchange (PE) is the standard treatment in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients who have lost the ability to walk. The effect of exchanges before this stage and the optimal number of exchanges for the other patients are still unknown. We randomized 556 GBS patients according to severity and number of exchanges as follows: Zero versus 2 PEs for patients who could walk-with or without aid-but not run, or who could stand up unaided (mild group); 2 versus 4 PEs for patients who could not stand up unaided (moderate group); and 4 versus 6 PEs for mechanically ventilated patients (severe group). In the mild group, 2 PEs were more effective than none for time to onset of motor recovery (median, 4 vs 8 days, respectively). In the moderate group, 4 PEs were more beneficial than 2 for time to walk with assistance (median, 20 vs 24 days) and for 1-year full muscle-strength recovery rate (64% vs 46%). Six PEs were no more beneficial than 4 in the severe cases. Patients with mild GBS on admission should receive 2 PEs. Patients with moderate and severe forms should benefit from 2 further exchanges.


alanvelander's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

Xnote Notes for this article (1 public)


X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.