CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

From diffusion tractography to quantitative white matter tract measures: a reproducibility study Export

NeuroImage, Vol. 18, No. 2. (February 2003), pp. 348-359.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

The aim of this study is to propose methods for assessing the reproducibility of diffusion tractography algorithms in future clinical studies and to show their application to the tractography algorithm developed in our unit, fast marching tractography (FMT). FMT estimates anatomical connectivity between brain regions using the information provided by diffusion tensor imaging. Three major white-matter pathways were investigated in 11 normal subjects--anterior callosal fibers, optic radiations, and pyramidal tracts. FMT was used to generate maps of connectivity metric, and regions of voxels with highest connectivity metric to an anatomically defined starting point were identified for each tract under investigation. The reproducibilities of tract-"normalized" volume (NV) and fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements were assessed over such regions. The values of tract volumes are consistent with the postmortem data. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for FA and NV ranged from 1.7 to 7.1% and from 2.2 to 18.6%, respectively. CVs were lowest in the anterior callosal fibers (range: 1.7- 7.8%), followed by the optic radiations (range: 1.2-18.6%) and pyramidal tracts (range: 2.6-15.5%), suggesting that fiber organization plays a role in determining the level of FMT reproducibility. In conclusion, these findings underline the importance of assessing the reliability of diffusion tractography before investigating white matter pathology.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.