Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003 Export

@article{citeulike:2134353, abstract = {In this study, productivity growth in 35 Australian universities is investigated using non-parametric frontier techniques over the period 1998-2003. The five inputs included in the analysis are full-time equivalent academic and non-academic staff, non-labour expenditure and undergraduate and postgraduate student load while the six outputs are undergraduate, postgraduate and Ph.D. completions, national competitive and industry grants and publications. Using Malmquist indices, productivity growth is decomposed into technical efficiency and technological change. The results indicate that annual productivity growth averaged 3.3\% across all universities, with a range from -1.8\% to 13.0\%, and was largely attributable to technological progress. However, separate analyses of research-only and teaching-only productivity indicate that most of this gain was attributable to improvements in research-only productivity associated with pure technical and some scale efficiency improvements. While teaching-only productivity also contributed, the largest source of gain in that instance was technological progress offset by a slight fall in technical efficiency.}, author = {Worthington, Andrew C. and Lee, Boon L.}, citeulike-article-id = {2134353}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.09.012}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VB9-4NNWCMD-1/2/8126d325c07c9ab3ed3683d99210777d}, doi = {10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.09.012}, journal = {Economics of Education Review}, keywords = {university, work}, posted-at = {2007-12-17 01:24:12}, priority = {2}, title = {Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.09.012}, volume = {In Press, Corrected Proof} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2134353 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2134353 N2 - In this study, productivity growth in 35 Australian universities is investigated using non-parametric frontier techniques over the period 1998-2003. The five inputs included in the analysis are full-time equivalent academic and non-academic staff, non-labour expenditure and undergraduate and postgraduate student load while the six outputs are undergraduate, postgraduate and Ph.D. completions, national competitive and industry grants and publications. Using Malmquist indices, productivity growth is decomposed into technical efficiency and technological change. The results indicate that annual productivity growth averaged 3.3% across all universities, with a range from -1.8% to 13.0%, and was largely attributable to technological progress. However, separate analyses of research-only and teaching-only productivity indicate that most of this gain was attributable to improvements in research-only productivity associated with pure technical and some scale efficiency improvements. While teaching-only productivity also contributed, the largest source of gain in that instance was technological progress offset by a slight fall in technical efficiency. JF - Economics of Education Review TI - Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003 VL - In Press, Corrected Proof KW - university KW - work AU - Worthington, Andrew AU - Lee, Boon UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.09.012 ER -