Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation Export

@article{citeulike:2224450, abstract = {The purpose of this project was to determine the validity of peer and self-evaluations of class participation compared to professors' class participation grades. Students (N = 96) evaluated themselves and their classmates on class participation on a four-point scale and students were required to assign grades in a normalized distribution. Relative to faculty evaluations, the bias and precision of the peer grades were 0.48 points and 36.3 per cent (p < 0.05) and self-evaluations scores were -0.48 and 77.5 per cent (p < 0.05).There was no correlation between a student's grade point average and his/her opinion of this process (R = 0.02). Students did not like peer assessment using forced distribution of grades. 10.1177/1469787407074049}, author = {Ryan, Gina J. and Marshall, Leisa L. and Porter, Kalen and Jia, Haomiao}, citeulike-article-id = {2224450}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074049}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://alh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/49}, day = {1}, doi = {10.1177/1469787407074049}, journal = {Active Learning in Higher Education}, keywords = {assessment, interaction, learning}, month = {March}, number = {1}, pages = {49--61}, posted-at = {2008-01-13 05:00:42}, priority = {2}, title = {Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074049}, volume = {8}, year = {2007} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2224450 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2224450 N2 - The purpose of this project was to determine the validity of peer and self-evaluations of class participation compared to professors' class participation grades. Students (N = 96) evaluated themselves and their classmates on class participation on a four-point scale and students were required to assign grades in a normalized distribution. Relative to faculty evaluations, the bias and precision of the peer grades were 0.48 points and 36.3 per cent (p < 0.05) and self-evaluations scores were -0.48 and 77.5 per cent (p < 0.05).There was no correlation between a student's grade point average and his/her opinion of this process (R = 0.02). Students did not like peer assessment using forced distribution of grades. 10.1177/1469787407074049 IS - 1 JF - Active Learning in Higher Education EP - 61 TI - Peer, professor and self-evaluation of class participation VL - 8 SP - 49 KW - assessment KW - interaction KW - learning AU - Ryan, Gina AU - Marshall, Leisa AU - Porter, Kalen AU - Jia, Haomiao PY - 2007/03/01/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074049 ER -