CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Tags

Analysis of insertion–deletion from deep-sequencing data: software evaluation for optimal detection

by: Joseph A. Neuman, Ofer Isakov, Noam Shomron
Briefings in Bioinformatics, Vol. 14, No. 1. (1 January 2013), pp. 46-55, doi:10.1093/bib/bbs013  Key: citeulike:10496528

Formatted Citation


Show HTML

Likes (beta)

This copy of the article hasn't been liked by anyone yet.

View FullText article


Abstract

Insertion and deletion (indel) mutations, the most common type of structural variance in the human genome, affect a multitude of human traits and diseases. New sequencing technologies, such as deep sequencing, allow massive throughput of sequence data and greatly contribute to the field of disease causing mutation detection, in general, and indel detection, specifically. In order to infer indel presence (indel calling), the deep-sequencing data have to undergo comprehensive computational analysis. Selecting which indel calling software to use can often skew the results and inherent tool limitations may affect downstream analysis. In order to better understand these inter-software differences, we evaluated the performance of several indel calling software for short indel (1–10 nt) detection. We compared the software’s sensitivity and predictive values in the presence of varying parameters such as read depth (coverage), read length, indel size and frequency. We pinpoint several key features that assist successful experimental design and appropriate tool selection. Our study may also serve as a basis for future evaluation of additional indel calling methods.


alnnfiai's tags for this article

Citations (CiTO)

No CiTO relationships defined

X There are no reviews yet

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History


X Export records

Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.