CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions Export

World Politics, Vol. 38, No. 1. (1985), pp. 226-254.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


amossiou's tags for this article

are current defect future incentive is less likely more other payoffs relative retaliate side the to today-since tomorrow valued

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Notes for this article

amossiou has 0 private notes and 1 public note for this article.

“The more future payoffs are valued relative to current payoffs, the less the incentive to defect today-since the other side is likely to retaliate tomorrow”

amossiou (public note) - 2009-05-13 17:32:42

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

Cooperation and discord in world politics are explained to a considerable extent by the three factors discussed in the Introduction: mutuality of interest, the shadow of the future, and the number of players. Yet the context of interaction, perceptions, and strategies is also important. Issues are linked to one another through multilevel games, which may be compatible or incompatible. Whether reciprocity constitutes an effective strategy depends both on linkages among issues and on the institutions within which negotiations take place. Perceptions are always significant and often decisive. Decision makers often actively seek to change the contexts within which they act by linking issues, trying to alter others' perceptions, establishing institutions, and promoting new norms. This finding suggests the importance of linking the upward-looking theory of strategy with the downward-looking theory of regimes.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.