CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.

Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean. Export

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 100, No. 1. (January 2008), pp. 69-75.

Citation Format

[Posts]

View FullText article


anabhan's tags for this article

cesarean

X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Posting History

X Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of adhesions and other long-term outcomes of two cesarean delivery techniques. METHODS: A total of 600 women were randomly assigned to either a standard (Pfannenstiel-Kerr) or modified (Joel-Cohen-Stark) technique for first-time cesarean delivery. A total of 124 women were assessed at repeat cesarean delivery. The primary outcome measure was the presence of adhesions. RESULTS: At repeat cesarean delivery, anesthesia-to-delivery time, total duration of surgery, change in hemoglobin level, time to mobilization and oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly less with the modified technique. Adhesions were found in 7 (11.3%) and 22 (35.5%) of the cases using the modified and standard techniques, respectively (P=0.0026; relative risk 3.14 [95% CI, 1.45-6.82]). CONCLUSION: A modified cesarean delivery technique, including Joel-Cohen incision, exteriorized full thickness suturing of the uterine incision, and non-closure of the peritoneum may reduce long-term morbidities of the procedure.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record


Privacy Statement | Terms & Conditions
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.