![]() |
CiteULike | ![]() |
anarchivist's CiteULike | ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Register | ![]() |
Log in | ![]() |
A Code for Classifiers: Whatever Happened to Merrill’s Code?by: Anita S. Coleman
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
Posting History
AbstractThe work titled "Code for Classifiers" by William Stetson Merrill is examined. The development of Merrill's Code over a period of 27 years, 1912-1939 is traced by examining bibliographic, attribution, conceptual and contextual differences. The general principles advocated, the differences between variants, and three controversial features of the Code: 1) the distinction between classifying vs. classification, 2) borrowing of the bibliographic principle of authorial intention, and 3) use of Dewey Decimal class numbers for classified sequence of topics, are also discussed. The paper reveals the importance of the Code in its own time, the complexities of its presentation and assessment by its contemporaries, and it’s status today.
BibTeX record
RIS record