Alarm symptoms and identification of non-cancer diagnoses in primary care: cohort study Export

@article{citeulike:5489604, abstract = {Objective To evaluate the predictive value of alarm symptoms for specified non-cancer diagnoses and cancer diagnoses in primary care. Design Cohort study using the general practice research database. Setting 128 general practices in the UK contributing data, 1994-2000. Participants 762 325 patients aged 15 or older. Main outcome measures Up to 15 pre-specified, non-cancer diagnoses associated with four alarm symptoms (haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, rectal bleeding) at 90 days and three years after the first recorded alarm symptom. For each outcome analyses were implemented separately in a time to event framework. Data were censored if patients died, left the practice, or reached the end of the study period. Results We analysed data on first episodes of haematuria (11 108), haemoptysis (4812), dysphagia (5999), or rectal bleeding (15 289). Non-cancer diagnoses were common in patients who presented with alarm symptoms. The proportion diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses generally increased with age. In patients presenting with haematuria, the proportions diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses within 90 days were 17.5\% (95\% confidence interval 16.4\% to 18.6\%) in women and 18.3\% (17.4\% to 19.3\%) in men. For the other symptoms the proportions were 25.7\% (23.8\% to 27.8\%) and 24\% (22.5\% to 25.6\%) for haemoptysis, 17.2\% (16\% to 18.5\%) and 22.6\% (21\% to 24.3\%) for dysphagia, and 14.5\% (13.7\% to 15.3\%) and 16.7\% (15.8\% to 17.5\%) for rectal bleeding. Conclusion Clinically relevant diagnoses are made in a high proportion of patients presenting with alarm symptoms. For every four to seven patients evaluated for haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, or rectal bleeding, relevant diagnoses will be identified in one patient within 90 days. 10.1136/bmj.b3094}, author = {Jones, Roger and Charlton, Judith and Latinovic, Radoslav and Gulliford, Martin C.}, citeulike-article-id = {5489604}, citeulike-linkout-0 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3094}, citeulike-linkout-1 = {http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/339/aug13_2/b3094}, day = {13}, doi = {10.1136/bmj.b3094}, journal = {BMJ}, keywords = {bleeding}, month = {August}, number = {aug13\_2}, pages = {b3094+}, posted-at = {2009-08-20 12:28:02}, priority = {2}, title = {Alarm symptoms and identification of non-cancer diagnoses in primary care: cohort study}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3094}, volume = {339}, year = {2009} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:5489604 L3 - citeulike-article-id:5489604 N2 - Objective To evaluate the predictive value of alarm symptoms for specified non-cancer diagnoses and cancer diagnoses in primary care. Design Cohort study using the general practice research database. Setting 128 general practices in the UK contributing data, 1994-2000. Participants 762 325 patients aged 15 or older. Main outcome measures Up to 15 pre-specified, non-cancer diagnoses associated with four alarm symptoms (haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, rectal bleeding) at 90 days and three years after the first recorded alarm symptom. For each outcome analyses were implemented separately in a time to event framework. Data were censored if patients died, left the practice, or reached the end of the study period. Results We analysed data on first episodes of haematuria (11 108), haemoptysis (4812), dysphagia (5999), or rectal bleeding (15 289). Non-cancer diagnoses were common in patients who presented with alarm symptoms. The proportion diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses generally increased with age. In patients presenting with haematuria, the proportions diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses within 90 days were 17.5% (95% confidence interval 16.4% to 18.6%) in women and 18.3% (17.4% to 19.3%) in men. For the other symptoms the proportions were 25.7% (23.8% to 27.8%) and 24% (22.5% to 25.6%) for haemoptysis, 17.2% (16% to 18.5%) and 22.6% (21% to 24.3%) for dysphagia, and 14.5% (13.7% to 15.3%) and 16.7% (15.8% to 17.5%) for rectal bleeding. Conclusion Clinically relevant diagnoses are made in a high proportion of patients presenting with alarm symptoms. For every four to seven patients evaluated for haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, or rectal bleeding, relevant diagnoses will be identified in one patient within 90 days. 10.1136/bmj.b3094 IS - aug13_2 JF - BMJ TI - Alarm symptoms and identification of non-cancer diagnoses in primary care: cohort study VL - 339 SP - b3094 KW - bleeding AU - Jones, Roger AU - Charlton, Judith AU - Latinovic, Radoslav AU - Gulliford, Martin PY - 2009/08/13/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3094 ER -